Man, under watch as possible S&S shooter, visited 2 businesses

Suspect tailed before face-off

Michael Lewis Chesney

Michael Lewis Chesney

Undercover officers tailed a suspect Sept. 3 in the slaying of a Bearden area cafeteria worker for nearly four hours - including trips to a credit union and a liquor store - before a fatal confrontation in an apartment where he was hiding under a bed.

Knoxville Police Chief Sterling P. Owen IV said officers didn't immediately pick Michael Lewis Chesney up for questioning in the Sept. 2 slaying because of legal constraints and a lack of certainty that Chesney was the main suspect.

"I'm satisfied with the way my officers handled it," the chief said.

Owen said the day after the fatal shooting of 60-year-old S&S Cafeteria cashier Dan Giles, police had information on six possible suspects, including Chesney, 54. He had worked at the cafeteria until August.

"We still didn't have enough information to say he was the suspect," the chief said. "We were looking for these others."

On the morning of Sept. 3, police released images of the slaying suspect obtained from the cafeteria surveillance cameras. The images showed the suspect entering and leaving the business at 4808 Kingston Pike.

Authorities said the robber struggled with Giles before shooting him once in the chest with a 9mm semiautomatic pistol. Money from the cash drawer scattered across the floor.

Police said the robber fled without any cash.

The public responded to the surveillance photos with tips about potential suspects.

Chesney's name as a possible suspect first surfaced about 11:30 a.m. Sept. 3 through investigative efforts and citizen tips, said Knoxville Police Department spokesman Darrell DeBusk.

Chesney's name, however, wasn't the first possible suspect developed through tips and investigation. Police obtained that first name about 10 a.m., DeBusk said.

"There were multiple calls and multiple names, even other names in other cities," he said.

While trying to check out all the names, police also noted Chesney was a viable suspect.

Police officer wounded; robbery suspect dead

Police chief briefing

He had been released from a federal prison in 2008 after serving a sentence for robbing the First Tennessee Bank on Millertown Pike in 2005. He was on supervised probation at the time of the cafeteria slaying.

As officers continued to rule out other suspects as not meeting the description of the cafeteria assailant, others at about 2 p.m. located Chesney's gray, 4-door Honda Accord parked at the Walter P. Taylor Homes housing development in East Knoxville, Owen said.

By 2:45 p.m., the chief said, officers were continuously watching Chesney's car.

Owen said police weren't watching any other suspects with such diligence, but at the same time, the nascent case against Chesney was wavering. Witnesses at 4 p.m. initially were unable to identify Chesney as Giles' killer.

"We were building a case, sometimes taking a step forward and sometimes taking a step back," Owen said.

At the same time, KPD was working with federal authorities. Chesney allegedly had violated his supervised probation, prompting federal authorities to seek a warrant for his arrest.

Chesney's probation officer referred questions to her supervisor, who is out of town.

Warren Mays, supervisory deputy for the U.S. Marshals Service, said the probation violation had been sealed by a federal judge.

As KPD officers awaited the federal arrest warrant, Chesney left his girlfriend's apartment in Walter P. Taylor Homes. Officers in unmarked cars quietly followed him.

Chesney's first stop was the News Sentinel.

Cindy Beck, manager of the Knoxville News Sentinel Credit Union, said Chesney had called the credit union shortly before 4 p.m. He wanted money from the account he had established while working in the newspaper distribution division in 2008 and 2009.

Beck, who knew Chesney well because he withdrew money regularly from his account, agreed to let him in the office, which closed at 4.

While Chesney often "reeked of alcohol" when in the credit union, Beck said he "was always pretty nice and polite when he came in."

Chesney arrived about 4:20 p.m. Three female employees let him in. Behind the closed front door of the credit union, they had him sign paperwork to withdraw money. Beck said Chesney "acted a little strange" but was polite and nonthreatening.

Beck said she was shocked when she later learned Chesney was the suspect in the cafeteria slaying.

"It really scared us when we found out," she said. "I mean, he'd already shot one man. Why wouldn't he kill us?"

Officers followed Chesney from the News Sentinel to the Magnolia Package Store, 3122 Magnolia Ave. Chesney then returned to his girlfriend's apartment, Owen said.

Police continued to watch the apartment, waiting for a judge to sign the federal probation violation warrant, the chief said.

"If we picked him up and he lawyered up on us, he could destroy evidence and not talk to us," Owen said. "We had no legal authority (to arrest Chesney). In fact, some of our witnesses had been unable to identify him in a lineup."

But with a federal warrant, Owen noted officers "not only had the legal right to pick him up, but to hold him."

The chief said officers were alerted a federal judge at 5:45 p.m. had signed the probation violation warrant.

At 6:25 p.m., the first witness positively identified Chesney as the foiled cafeteria robber, said KPD Lt. Doug Stiles. That identification, however, took a back seat to the federal warrant.

At 6:33 p.m., officers approached the apartment with the warrant, asking for Chesney. The female resident denied he was there, but she consented to allow officers to search, police said.

When an officer lifted the bed skirt on a bed, Chesney fired a round from under the bed from a 9mm semiautomatic pistol at Officer Brandon Stryker, hitting him in the torso. Stryker's bullet-resistant vest stopped the round from entering his body.

Police said Stryker and two other officers returned fire. Chesney died at the scene.

Stryker is recuperating. The two other officers who fired at Chesney, Krista Shepperd and John Holmes, are on routine administrative leave with pay pending a review of the shooting.

DeBusk said officers found a hat, a torn blue shirt and shoes in the apartment and in Chesney's car that matched those worn by the cafeteria robber.

Don Jacobs may be reached at 865-342-6345.

Get Copyright Permissions © 2010, Knoxville News Sentinel Co.
Want to use this article? Click here for options!

© 2010 Knoxville News Sentinel. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

  • Discuss
  • Print

Related Topics

Related Stories

Comments » 29

gster writes:

Excellent work KPD. hope the officer fully recovers. All of them actually. It does something to the mind to have to take a life whether good or bad. Prayers for all including the girls at KNSCU.

chbradshaw writes:

The more that comes out about this the more discomforting it becomes.

First, we learned that, contrary to the S&S management's claim that "we do everything possible to protect our cusomers and employees" they in fact hired a federal bank robber.

We also learned the News-Sentinel had hired the same guy.

Now we learn the police apparently watched as a convicted bank robber, parole violator and possible murderer the night before strolled into a credit union staffed by three women after hours.

Gosh that could have ended bad and the cops were outside watching.

Kasey writes:

in response to chbradshaw:

The more that comes out about this the more discomforting it becomes.

First, we learned that, contrary to the S&S management's claim that "we do everything possible to protect our cusomers and employees" they in fact hired a federal bank robber.

We also learned the News-Sentinel had hired the same guy.

Now we learn the police apparently watched as a convicted bank robber, parole violator and possible murderer the night before strolled into a credit union staffed by three women after hours.

Gosh that could have ended bad and the cops were outside watching.

On one hand it is scary, but everyone deserves a second chance. If no company is willing to give parloees a job, they will definitely return to life of crime. This guy did anyway, but at least he was given a chance to live a normal life again. Too bad he threw it away.

knoxfrox writes:

Great job KPD!

umwarimu writes:

in response to chbradshaw:

The more that comes out about this the more discomforting it becomes.

First, we learned that, contrary to the S&S management's claim that "we do everything possible to protect our cusomers and employees" they in fact hired a federal bank robber.

We also learned the News-Sentinel had hired the same guy.

Now we learn the police apparently watched as a convicted bank robber, parole violator and possible murderer the night before strolled into a credit union staffed by three women after hours.

Gosh that could have ended bad and the cops were outside watching.

Did you not read the article? Obviously you have no formal training in criminal law. They had no grounds for arrest. He was only a suspect. They were however hot on his trail in less than 24 hrs. Great work KPD! Our true American Heroes! Thank you for making our world a safer place. May God always watch over and protect you from harm.

EnoughAlready writes:

in response to chbradshaw:

The more that comes out about this the more discomforting it becomes.

First, we learned that, contrary to the S&S management's claim that "we do everything possible to protect our cusomers and employees" they in fact hired a federal bank robber.

We also learned the News-Sentinel had hired the same guy.

Now we learn the police apparently watched as a convicted bank robber, parole violator and possible murderer the night before strolled into a credit union staffed by three women after hours.

Gosh that could have ended bad and the cops were outside watching.

You have got to be kidding me with your post! The article is clear that even witnesses to the S & S shooting couldn't id the guy. The police had no legal authority to take him into custody. There is something called the 4th amendment to the constitution. You know...that pesky constitution thing! It gets in the way every time. Besides, if the police had picked him up early and couldn't prove the case he may have gotten away with the shooting. Some people just can't be happy or satisfied no matter how the police reacts. In some people's mind it's a no-win situation for police in every move they make, every day of the week. If you wish to continue to be critical, why don't you give it a try. They are hiring! Fantastic job KPD! Glad you guys and gals are there for us.

willposey writes:

Excellent police work.

sierramister writes:

I say we shut the package store down on Magnolia.

mfree#210125 writes:

"lifted the skirt on a bed"

*sigh*. Nobody could find anything long enough to flip that up without getting down on level? Lesson learned, I suppose.

JustAGuy writes:

Why hasn't the girlfriend been charged as an assessory yet and kicked out of public housing?

Patriot writes:

The girlfriend needs to be in jail for a very long time.

Littleskamper writes:

Maybe the girlfriend was being threatened by the shooter and was told to say he wasn't there.

Raistlin writes:

in response to JustAGuy:

Why hasn't the girlfriend been charged as an assessory yet and kicked out of public housing?

I agree 100%

rghall#584097 writes:

in response to Littleskamper:

Maybe the girlfriend was being threatened by the shooter and was told to say he wasn't there.

reckon what she was doing whiles he went to fetch some likker?

SouthChapman writes:

in response to sierramister:

I say we shut the package store down on Magnolia.

How about shutting down the Walgreens, CVS, and all the banks on Kingston Pike.

Raistlin writes:

in response to Littleskamper:

Maybe the girlfriend was being threatened by the shooter and was told to say he wasn't there.

And she was afraid he was going to shoot her from under the bed when she opened the door? Really? How easy would it have been for her to step outside the door when she answered instead of lying to the police?

Littleskamper writes:

in response to Raistlin:

And she was afraid he was going to shoot her from under the bed when she opened the door? Really? How easy would it have been for her to step outside the door when she answered instead of lying to the police?

Honestly, you are probably right. She is probably guilty of covering for him. But if there is a squirrelly little dude that's probably cracked out waving a gun around my small house, whether he's my boyfriend or not, it might be hard to do the right thing under pressure. In my house, you would be able to shoot from the bed to the front door....just saying.

lennisw#557174 writes:

Something really stinks. Problem one with this story:

"He had been released from a federal prison in 2008 after serving a sentence for robbing the First Tennessee Bank on Millertown Pike in 2005. He was on supervised probation at the time of the cafeteria slaying."

TWO AND ONE HALF YEARS FOR BANK ROBBERY???? I figure it took 6 months to try him. Who decided to let him out and why?
One must suspect he is some kind of Federal snitch or something and he must have made a deal of some kind. Nothing else makes sense.
Problem two with this story:

"Chesney's probation officer referred questions to her supervisor, who is out of town."

What does this probation officer do, if she can't make decisions in an emergency? I smell a special circumstance kind of situation. Don't forget,the cops are following a man around that is as dangerous as a tiger.

Problem three and it is a beaut:

"Warren Mays, supervisory deputy for the U.S. Marshals Service, said the probation violation had been sealed by a federal judge."

What???? Who is this judge? Why can't we find out who he is, or what Chesney did, that we are not supposed to know about? The man is dead. You can't revoke his parole or predjudice a case against him in court.
Was it the same judge that finally signed the warrant? Was Chesney being protected by the feds? What else did he do while out on "supervised probation" besides murder a man?
KPD did a fine job. Considering how the system let them down, they did a great job. We should give the police raises.

suess writes:

why did he get in to bank? I'm not scary and could never get in after hours .What was those girls thinking ?

brent808#279563 writes:

Enough about this story already. Put it to rest!

mook writes:

in response to JustAGuy:

Why hasn't the girlfriend been charged as an assessory yet and kicked out of public housing?

I totally agree. And if he had done nothing wrong, why lie. She had to have known something in my opinion.

keepitreal4vols writes:

CBS, NBC, whoever should put up a fence and cameras in Walter P Taylor and make a reality show out of it. There will be 1 girl, couple of babies, and alot of drugs left at the end of the season.

Sithdaddy writes:

Glad to hear that Stryker is recovering from his wounds. It's a good thing officers wear those vest. Career criminals are the ones who will likely shoot it out w/ cops instead of going back to jail.

RussellP (Inactive) writes:

Good solid police work by KPD. It's the little details that add up. As for the federal system, the feds are overpaid and underworked. 2 KPD guys are worth 10 feds.

Juvenal writes:

"But with a federal warrant, Owen noted officers 'not only had the legal right to pick him up, but to hold him.'"

Seems like that goes against Eric Holder's creative argument that local law enforcement has no right to enforce federal law, and in fact has the obligation to not enforce it. Of course that argument is very new and selectively applied.

cjensen writes:

Juvenal writes:
"But with a federal warrant, Owen noted officers 'not only had the legal right to pick him up, but to hold him.'"

Seems like that goes against Eric Holder's creative argument that local law enforcement has no right to enforce federal law, and in fact has the obligation to not enforce it. Of course that argument is very new and selectively applied."
------------------------------
Another brain surgeon at work.

Look, picking someone up for violating a federal law, especially one that isn't being enforced, is altogether different than having a Federal warrant on someone. The same? Totally different.

Juvenal writes:

in response to cjensen:

Juvenal writes:
"But with a federal warrant, Owen noted officers 'not only had the legal right to pick him up, but to hold him.'"

Seems like that goes against Eric Holder's creative argument that local law enforcement has no right to enforce federal law, and in fact has the obligation to not enforce it. Of course that argument is very new and selectively applied."
------------------------------
Another brain surgeon at work.

Look, picking someone up for violating a federal law, especially one that isn't being enforced, is altogether different than having a Federal warrant on someone. The same? Totally different.

Since you're such a legal scholar, I hope you don't mind if I pick your brain a little:

Holder says local law enforcement can't enforce federal law. This is a complete novelty in the legal world. But what's even more unique is your contention that enforcing a federal warrant is somehow different or apart from enforcing federal law, and I wondered if you would elaborate on that.

You also seem to be saying that local law enforcement can only enforce federal laws based on 1) a warrant handed down by a federal judge, or 2) the arbitrary decision of a federal bureaucrat on which laws are to be enforced at what times and places. Not even Holder is saying anything that silly or that arbitrary--yet. But since you have such a great legal mind, I was hoping you could elaborate on how any of this nonsense (if it were actually part of the real world, which it's thankfully not) would be fair, and, more importantly, how you have the nerve to make things up off the top of your head and pretend you know what you're talking about.

As a brain surgeon, my Rx for you is to drop the self-deception and willful ignorance and replace it with a little humility.

Golfnutt59 writes:

in response to EnoughAlready:

You have got to be kidding me with your post! The article is clear that even witnesses to the S & S shooting couldn't id the guy. The police had no legal authority to take him into custody. There is something called the 4th amendment to the constitution. You know...that pesky constitution thing! It gets in the way every time. Besides, if the police had picked him up early and couldn't prove the case he may have gotten away with the shooting. Some people just can't be happy or satisfied no matter how the police reacts. In some people's mind it's a no-win situation for police in every move they make, every day of the week. If you wish to continue to be critical, why don't you give it a try. They are hiring! Fantastic job KPD! Glad you guys and gals are there for us.

What if while the Police were "watching" the SUSPECT, he had shot and killed more people in the KNS Credit Union or the Liquor Store???? The guy was a FELON; they had probable cause--take him in and shine the bright lights on him until he squeals!!!!!

In the words of Obama, "the Police acted stupidly."

EnoughAlready writes:

in response to Golfnutt59:

What if while the Police were "watching" the SUSPECT, he had shot and killed more people in the KNS Credit Union or the Liquor Store???? The guy was a FELON; they had probable cause--take him in and shine the bright lights on him until he squeals!!!!!

In the words of Obama, "the Police acted stupidly."

Golfnutt...Nutt being the proper name for you! Sorry dude...you have watched way too much television in your lifetime. The guy was a convicted felon for a bank robbery, BUT they did NOT have probable cause from the S & S shooting. If you will read the article carefully, you will see in the beginning of the investigation not even the first few witnesses were able to pick this guy out of a lineup. Where is your probable cause there? Wait...let me answer...There wasn't any. The only way the police would have acted "stupidly" would be to detain him prior to having probable cause. But again, it's obvious your only knowledge of how law enforcement works and how the law works is based on 60 minute crime shows on tv. Here's a suggestion Nutt...read a few law books, take a few classes, do something to educate yourself before you run off at the mouth with your "stupidly" comments.

Want to participate in the conversation? Become a subscriber today. Subscribers can read and comment on any story, anytime. Non-subscribers will only be able to view comments on select stories.

Features